E-mail Marketing Deliverability Test Report
Email deliverability rate is the single most critical factor to the success of email campaigns. Why? simply because when subscribers never receive your emails, there is no way they can take the desired action. All other efforts are in vain unless you confirm that your current email marketing system offers you a high bulk email deliverability rates. Email marketing software solutions such as Constant Contact , Cheetah Mail, Bronto, or Vertical Response tout their higher email deliverability rates as a major benefits of using their email marketing services. But what is real? Are these email marketing software services deliverability rate truly higher than a well designed in-house email marketing system? And if the answer is yes, then what kind of return on investment (ROI) can you reasonably expect? Are numbers valid across the board or can your industry focus, email communication type or email list be a factor in the outcome?
All of these questions are legitimates ones. On this page you find a real life email marketing deliverability case study excerpt to give you a sense of what we do, and a feel for the return on investment you might get from hiring professional email marketing deliverability consultants.
This case study relates to a client who used an in-house bulk email system hosted in a co-located environment at a tier 1 Internet Service Provider in the U.S. We only relate part of the report on this page, more specifically the part pertaining to test results for their in-house system vs. Constant Contact. The client name is obfuscated for obvious confidentiality reasons, however we guarantee that all figures related below are 100% true and accurate.
| Week 1 | In-house Email Solution | vs. | Constant Contact |
| Sent |
3048 |
2998 |
|
| Clicks |
129 |
218 |
|
| Unique Clicks |
110 |
181 |
|
| Orders |
16 |
27 |
|
|
First |
4 |
1 |
|
|
Repeat |
12 |
26 |
|
| Week 2 | In-house Email Solution | vs. | Constant Contact |
| Sent |
3063 |
3012 |
|
| Clicks |
196 |
239 |
|
| Unique Clicks |
145 |
188 |
|
| Orders |
18 |
24 |
|
|
First |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Repeat |
17 |
24 |
|
| Week 3 | In-house Email Solution | vs. | Constant Contact |
|
Sent |
3079 |
3023 |
|
|
Clicks |
140 |
157 |
|
|
Unique Clicks |
109 |
135 |
|
|
Orders |
11 |
22 |
|
|
First |
2 |
0 |
|
|
Repeat |
9 |
22 |
|
| Email Marketing Deliverabiity Test ROI | In-house Email Solution | vs. | Constant Contact |
|
Cumulated orders |
45 |
73 |
|
|
First |
7 |
1 |
|
|
Repeat |
38 |
72 |
|
| Total order amount |
$13,680 |
$25,312 |
|
| Total additional weeekly sales for 3000 emails/week |
$11,632 |
||
|
Total anticipated additional weekly sales for 50000 emails/week (complete email database) |
$193,700 |
||
|
Total anticipated additional yearly sales for 50000 emails/week (complete email database) |
$10,072,400 |
||
As we can see from this report excerpt, a higher deliverability rate might translate into a small increase of unique click-through but make a huge difference in sales at the end of year. When this kind of gains is achieved at the outset, it usually makes sense to dig deeper into more complex marketing tactics. For instance, we frequently deploy additional email marketing techniques to further increase email marketing effectiveness to subscribers not currently opening up clients emails, or combine marketing channels and re-marketing to increase overall marketing strategies effectiveness. Send us an inquiry to tap into the unrealized value of your current email lists.




